Iron Raptor ([info]iron_raptor) wrote,
@ 2007-06-01 16:19:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: thoughtful

Societal Governance in SecondLIfe, vs. Freedom of Thought and expression
http://www.secondlifeinsider.com/2007/06/01/our-world-our-rules/

So Linden Labs has tried to at least police the grid in some way by establishing a few ground rules for civil obedience. The problem is that it is so vaguely worded that it begs to ask the question; "What does it mean by "broadly offensive?""

By that definition, Goreans, Furries, BDSM, and gay / lesbians in SecondLife would be considered "broadly offensive". This ties into my explanation yesterday of taking accountability for one's actions. Americans are so used to suing companies and government for their own mishaps that it has become pervasive and infests every part of our lives, even our virtual ones.

Now, why do I mention SecondLIfe? Because SecondLife is an excellent example to observe human society from as close to a third person perspective as possible. In so doing, there are some stark realizations that come about, that relate itself to the real world. If anything adds MORE proof of what abdication of personal responsibility does, I turn you to this article...

http://www.secondlifeinsider.com/2007/06/01/feeling-the-squeeze-your-tax-dollars-at-work/

For those who aren't keen on reading this, it means that New York state has passed a bill making it illegal to sell M rated games to minors. In fact, it's listed as a Class E felony, right up there with riot in the first degree, first degree aggravated harassment, bigamy, incest, and wiretapping.

And I agree with this article, this unconstitutional bill is being drafted and passed with YOUR tax dollars. Millions of dollars of YOUR hard-earned money is being put to restrict your freedoms and your rights as an individual. Supposedly it's to "protect the children", and while the goal to protect children is noble, it also acts as a double edged sword. Children who aren't exposed to these things will probably have MORE difficulty coping with it. That's why there is such venomous permeation of "Political Correctness" in this world today. People take offense because they don't know how to deal with things that are different, they're too stuck up, and the pattern of child-rearing (generally speaking, there are exceptions) re-enforces that anal-retentive behaviour.

Or perhaps this is some sort of attempt for politicians and senators to validate that they're working, that they are doing something rather than taking kickbacks from companies to wipe out a neighbourhood for the purposes of putting up a shopping mall. Either way, this is distressing news, and what's even more disappointing is that many people don't do anything to stop it, and in fact are willing to relinquish more if their freedoms because they're too concerned with getting that promotion, or getting that big fat paycheck so they can indulge themselves on meaningless trinkets in order to validate their existence on this planet.

If the previous paragraph upsets you or offends you, ask yourself why it does that? Could it be that there is some truth there that's somehow reflected on your life? Then if so, prove me wrong. Write to your congressman or congresswoman, stage a non-violent protest, do something positive to take back your rights, and take responsibility for your actions, and your children, because if you don't, then you are allowing the people you voted for and pay their taxes for to strip you of your freedoms.




(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kibbles
2007-06-01 11:58 pm UTC (link)
I don't have a problem with M rated games not being legal for sale to minors -- but a Class E felony?

However a class E felony is the lowest rated felony, A is the worst.

From the NYC criminal court page:
Felony - An offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year may be imposed. For the purpose of sentence, felonies are divided into five categories or classes: A, B, C, D and E felonies. Class A felonies are divided into two sub-categories: A-I and A-II felonies. Class A felonies carry the longest jail sentences and class E felonies carry the shortest jail sentences for felony cases. Jail sentences for misdemeanor and violations or infractions are even shorter.

Still too much but the illegal to sell to MINORS is ok. Illegal to sell, period, that I have a VERY serious problem with. What is the fine for letting a minor in an X rated movie or a 16 year old in an R rated movie? That I would like to know. Plus for a business, FINES are a good deterrent. Or even shut someone down for multiple offenses like they do with people who sell alcohol or cigarettes to minors. But JAIL? Puleeze.

And wtf is that shit about not exposing kids to things? So I should let my kids watch porn or something so they won't have difficulty coping with sex or something? That exposing so they get used to it makes no sense -- and in fact unfortunately too many kids (and adults!) are desensitized to violence and other things. There needs to be a middle ground.

At the end of the day, minors have less freedom than adults. I am against restricting freedom of ADULTS. But minors? I give the government more slack with that. Stripping my children of 'freedoms' is different from stripping me. They can play all the violent games when they are older, and out of my house. Same with tattoos, smoking, drinking, porn, and some other things we restrict.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]iron_raptor
2007-06-02 12:16 am UTC (link)
I'm not saying we should let kids watch porn, but they should be taught in a proper setting about what goes in in the world. I mean... often times I see parents wanting the government to parent for them rather than taking the initiative. Not every parent is like that, but I notice a stark increase in the lack of personal responsibility lately.

As far as sexually explicit content, I think that should be the discretion of the parent. Kids will turn into adults, so sooner or later they're GOING to be exposed to it, so it's up to the parent to help prepare them for that. As far as violence in videogames, I agree. There SHOULD be limitations set for kids, there should also be an awareness that parents must have too, because there is that tendancy to group ALL video games as bad, rather than just the few video games, like Rockstar's Manhunt 2 for the Wii.

What I'm basically saying is that parenting the children should be the responsibility of the PARENTS, not the government, and all too often many relinquish their freedoms to raise their children how they see fit to the government, which is a bad idea because... well... ANY institution that tries to micro-manage the lives of its citizens usually ends up in disaster.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kibbles
2007-06-02 02:27 am UTC (link)
I see no problem if legal adults are able to get it.

It is the responsibility of me, yes, but if you have places actively undermining you, then steps need to be made to ensure that does not happen. Like IDing people for buying cigarettes, alcohol, going into bars, and in this case I guess videogames. I just feel a felony is over the top.

And if you keep from selling these M games from kids then maybe parents will see more of the GOOD games out there. But if you make the M games accessable and your kid comes home from the Mall with one, then there ya go.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(3 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…